[this needs editing; sorry; we may get to it.] From: Simin Royanian Date: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:09 am Subject: Re: Sam Kubba is sending you this article from Al-Jazeera English web site. I was not able to open the article. However I am responding to thiS meassage. I am writing in capital letters to distinguish my response from the quotes. --- Roglow@aol.com wrote: > As one who opposed the U.S. military involvement in > Iraq and who continues to believe that we... WOULD YOU PLEASE DEFINE THIS "WE"? WERE YOU A PART OF THE DECISION TO BOMB IRAQ AND OCCUPY IT? ARE YOU SAYING THAT YOU STAND UNITED WITHE THE ACTIONS OF YOUR GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD? IF NOT, IT WOULD LEAD TO A MORE CLEAR DISCUSSION TO SAY THE US GOVERNMET'S FOREIGN POLICY. I WILL REFER TO US GOVERNMENT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE US, WHICH DEFENDS THE INTEREST OF THE US CAPITALIST RULING CLASS, FROM THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOLE OF THE US. THE 5 PERCENT RULING CLASS WHICH OWNS MORE THAN 80% OF THE WEALTH IN THIS COUNTRY. >made a serious foreign policy mistake THE DECISION TO BOMB AND OCUPY AFGHANESTAN, IRAQ, BUILD MILITARY BASES IN 156 COUNTRIES( ACCORDING TO US DEFENCE DEPARTMENT), TRAIN KILLERS AND TORTURES IN THE SAM, DECLARE IN THE WASHINGTON POST THAT THE US IS PLANNING TO TRAIN PARA-MILITARY FORCES IN IRAQ, AND COUNTLESS OTHER CRIMES OF THE US GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE PEOLE OF THE THIRD WORLD IS NOT A "MISTAKE". THESE ARE PLANED AND SYSTEMATIC ACTIONS OF THE IMPERIALISTIC AND MILITARISTIC GOVERNMENT OF THE US WHICH HAS INSTALLED COUNTLESS DICTATORSHIPS AROUND THE WORLD TO CONTROL THE GENUINE AND DEMOCRATIC STRUGGLES OF THE PEOLPE AGAINST THE ECONOMIC OR AND MILITARY OCCUPATION OF THEIR COUNRIES. I RECOMMEND EVERYONE WHO IS INTERESTED IN A PRINCIPLED DISCUSSION OF THE US POLICY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, TO READ THE KISSINGER PLAN, WHERE IT IS STATED THAT THE US MUST TAKE OVER THE OIL FIELDS OF THE ME AND SEND EXPERTS FROM TEXAS AND OKLAHOMA TO RUN THEM IN THE INTEREST OF THE US. THEN FOLLOW THROUGH WITH EVERY PRESIDENTS NATIONAL SECURITY PRORAM SINCE THEN, AND THE THE PROGRAM OF THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY AND LEARN THAT THIS IS NOT A POREIGN POLICY MISTAKE BUT A PLANNED PROGRAM FOR HE DOMINATION OF THE WORLD BY THE US GOVERNMENT AT ANY PRICE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD. >despite obvious brutality of the Saddam regime, I >have to question the motives of the dissemination of >the above article. WHY DISCUSS THE MOTIVATION OF A PERSON INSTEAD OF DISCUSSING THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE? THIS KIND OF PERSONAL ATTACK ON A PERSON FOR JUST SENDING AN ATTACHMENT DOES NOT LEAD TO OPEN DIALOGUE. >While restraining women and children is unfortunate, IT IS NOT "UNFORTUNATE". FOR THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN WHO ARE RESTRAINED AS CRIMINALS IN THE INTERSET OF AN ACCUPYING POWER, IT IS MONSROUS, IT IS A CRIME, IT IS VIOLATION OF THEIR BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS ACCORDING TO THE INTERNANATIONAL LAW. THEY ARE HUMAN BEINGS WHO AHAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO THE OPRESSION OF A GOVERNMEN WHICH WAS SUPPOSTED BY THE US GOVERNMENT WHEN IT WENT TO WAR WITH THEI NEIGHBOR IRAN AND DRAGGED THEIR SUNS AND FATHERS THEOUGH A CUMPULSORY MILITARY SERVICE TO A AN 8 YEAR WAR AND THEN THE ATTACK ON IRAQ. THE US GOVERNMENT AND ITS EUROPEAN ALLIES SUPPORTED SADDAM HUSSEIN AND SOLD HIM THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS HE USED AGAINST MY KURDISH BROTHERS AND SISTERS. NOW THE AMERICAN MILITARY OCCUOIES IRAQ AND DETAINS ANRESTRICS MY SISTERS AND THEI CHILDERN AND THAT IS UNFORTUNATE? AN EARTHQUAKE IS UNFORTUANTE. THE ACTIONS OF THE US GOVERNMENT IN IRAQ ARE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. > perhaps the reasons become clearer when one Considers that women may be used for suicide bombings and children may be used as unknowing carriers of > explosives. SO WOMEN AND CHILDREN OF THE MIDDLE EAST ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS WITH HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY ARE JUST COLLATERAL DAMAGE AND POSSIBLE CHESS PEACES. These abuses pale in comparison with the actions of the former Iraqi regime which employed "official rape" and murder of children of opponents of Saddam. ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO CERDIBLE AND DOCUMENTED INFORMATION ON THESE CHARGES, I AM NOT COMCERNED ABOUT THEM BECAUSE SADDAM HUSSEIN IS NOT MY CONCERN. HE WAS NOT ELLECTED BY YOU, I OR THE PEOLE OF IRAQ. HOWEVER YOU ARE SAYING THAT SINCE SADDAM HUSEIN DID HORRIBLE CRIMES AGAINST THESE WOMEN AND CHILDREN IF THE US MILITARY DOES THESE OTHER CRIMES IT IS OK SINCE THE ALE IN COPARISON. SO IF SOMEONE RAPES AND KILLS ONE OF MY CHILDREN, THE NEXT ONE COMES AROUND AND JUST RAPES AND DOES NOT KILL, OR BLOODIES MY SECOND CHILD, I SHULD BE THANKFUL TO THEIS SECOND CRIMINAL BECAUSE HE IS NOT AS BAD AS THE DIRST CRIMINAL. MARTIN LUTHER KING SAID,"MY COUNTRY, THE BIGGEST PURVEYER OF VIOLENCE" IN 1967. THAT WAS BEFORE THE CRIMES COMMITTED ALL OVER THE WORLD BY THE US GOVERNMENT SINCE 1967. YOU DID NOT ELLECT SADDAM HUSSEIN, BUT YOU ARE LIVING IN A COUNTY WHERE YOU BELIEVE THEE IS REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT. YOUR TAXES ARE PAYING FOR THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN IRAQ AND THE REST OF THE WORLD BY THE US MILITARY. >Perhaps Al-Jazeera, the American-Iraqi Chamber of >Commerce and the Islamic Observation Center should >save their outrage for the continued repression of > women in the Middle East. AS I SAID I WAS NOT ABLE TO OPEN THE ATTACHMENT. I AM A WOMAN OF THE MIDDLE EAST WHOSE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT WAS OVERTHROWN BY A CIA COUP IN 1953. THE SECRET POLICE SECURITY APPARATUS EASTABLISHED BY CIA AND CALLED SAVAK IMPRISONED, TORTURED, MURDERED, RAPED MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS FOR 25 YEARS. YOUR ATATMENT HERE IS A CYNICAL AFFRONT TO THE PEOLRO PF THE MIDDLE EAST ESPECIALLY THE SFFERING AND COURAGEOUS WOMEN OF THE MIDDLE EAST. ONE OF US JUST WONE THE NOBEL PEACE PRICE. SHE LIVES AND WORKS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CHILDRENS RIGHTS IN AN ISLAMIC COUNTY WHICH HAS SIGNED THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN. USA, ALONG WITH SOMALIA, ARETHE ONLY TWO COUNTRIES WHICH ARE NOT SIGNATORY TO THAT CONVENTION. THE US GOVERNMENT HAS NOT RATIFIED THE COVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOME, AND IT HAS OPPOSED THE WORLD COURT. DON'T YOU THINK THAT AS A US CITIZEN YOU SHOULD TAKE ON YOUR GOVERMNET? THE PEOLE OF IRAQ AR NOT OCCUPYING THE US, THE US IS OCCUPYING IRAQ. IF ANOTHER COUNTRY'S MILITARY SETS FOOT HERE, IN THE GREAT USA? WOULD YOU RESIST THEM?